User Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

MultiRotorUK ShoutBox

Refresh History
  • hoverfly: beararsedcheek... :laugh:
    September 18, 2018, 18:42:15
  • Bad Raven: or bearreft, or bear left?
    September 17, 2018, 14:21:16
  • Bad Raven: or isnotherebear
    September 17, 2018, 14:20:30
  • Bad Raven: more like doesnotcarebear
    September 17, 2018, 14:20:07
  • Gav: carebear?
    September 17, 2018, 11:37:44
  • atomiclama: you there bear??
    September 15, 2018, 11:42:45
  • Reman: Got stuck in traffic yesterday. After an hour I started using my phone (And an OTG cable) to look through the media files on a keyring of my old USB sticks. Found one that had the entire run of "Firefly" on it. I got through 3 episodes before the traffic started moving again....... God, That really was an amazing show.
    September 14, 2018, 19:52:46
  • Gav: ok dude
    September 08, 2018, 16:40:59
  • mo_miah: Gav- if its a camera ship then TBS crossfire is definitely what you need, the FrSky has limited channels and telemetry options, TBS crossfire has much better features and more channels to control camera gimbals etc
    September 07, 2018, 11:53:01
  • Gav: mo miah - wanna swap from immertionRC UHF and try something else on my camera Ship.
    September 07, 2018, 11:25:40
  • DarkButterfly: My laminate arrived, the rebuild is coming along ~~
    September 06, 2018, 20:00:44
  • hoverfly: I coated a couple of Slipstreams  a few years ago  It stiffened up the wing nicely .On the down side although it prevented dings when i had an high speed"arrival" it left the resin cracked. and the glass lifted slightly.  Well stuck laminate stiffens the wing and is flexible..
    September 06, 2018, 18:26:13
  • DarkButterfly: I'm doing laminate, just put my order in for some, also got some balsa wood for the side parts, had to use a kitchen knife to seperate the foam from the busted wood
    September 05, 2018, 13:21:11
  • atomiclama: Thanks, can't decide on fibre glass or laminate. Like the idea of fibre for some reason, don't know why.
    September 05, 2018, 10:45:48
  • Bad Raven: Usng PolyC, yes
    September 05, 2018, 10:13:54
  • atomiclama: Anyone fibre glass coat their wings??
    September 05, 2018, 09:30:22
  • atomiclama: @DB well you obviously need a bigger motor and ESC, as flying slower is just not possible.  ::)
    September 05, 2018, 09:29:59
  • DarkButterfly: ~~
    September 05, 2018, 09:10:18
  • hoverfly: If you put a couple of coats of Eze Kote on the wing before the laminate it sticks really well lifting.. :smiley:
    September 05, 2018, 08:47:37
  • DarkButterfly: If it makes you feel better, I’m going to completely refurbish my falcon Evo with new balsa sides and new laminate ~~
    September 04, 2018, 21:42:53

Who's Online

Theme Selection

Forum Default


Author Topic: RunCam Owl2  (Read 263 times)

Offline Bad Raven

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1561
  • Liked: 623
  • Country: gb
RunCam Owl2
« on: April 15, 2018, 20:23:46 »
Quite a while back now I pressed the button on one of these RunCam Owl2's on super special offer.  My thinking was that it would help on those dull flat days when I find using FPV unexcitingly dull (or frighteningly scary!  :whistling: ). Not that I had a quad to put it on at that time!

Well, it sat in its box untouched and ageing until the other days flying proved that the good old "hack" Nighthawk 280 camera (the original CMOS tat) was just not cutting it when compared to my other better equipped quads. (It hadn't been used much for a while anyway stuck on Baseflight till I managed to get the latest Betaflight successfully into the ancient Skyline32 on its all-in-one board.

So, I decided if the thing had the name "Nighthawk", it might as well try and live up to it, and in the last hour have fitted the Owl2.

JEEEEEZ does it cut through the gloom!!   :o  VERY impressive!  ~~

I have heard that the Owl wasn't that great in full light, but that the Owl2 is better balanced.  I don't care that much about performance in good light, as I won't be using it when the weather is good (if it ever improves   :banghead:).

If anyone is interested I'll come back with a few reports in differing conditions.

Offline ched999uk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2766
  • Liked: 628
  • Country: gb
Re: RunCam Owl2
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2018, 21:04:18 »
It's always interesting to see real life use of kit.
A good cam for low light sounds fun.

Offline Bad Raven

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1561
  • Liked: 623
  • Country: gb
Re: RunCam Owl2
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2018, 19:36:38 »
Sunny with a few fluffy whites today while at indoor/outdoor location. (12-15mph but who cares)

Outdoor first, and unsurprisingly had to dial the headset brilliance and contrast back significantly as it was bright though not washed out (When fitted on Sun afternoon it had only been tested indoors in unlit home hall and dusk garden, neither actually flown).

In the none too well lit sports hall (flourescents and tiny north facing windows) it worked pretty well without further adjustment, so good I actually flew a few banked turn circuits in a lull when the others in my group were exercising their jaws rather than flying (which is largely the norm for them really, I do a lot of indoor solo flying in a group!!!!!)  :rolleyes:

Offline Bad Raven

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1561
  • Liked: 623
  • Country: gb
Re: RunCam Owl2
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2018, 06:45:54 »
Managed an hour and a half yesterday to test it in brilliant sunshine at the club flying field. Near zero wind, and only me and a flying buddy there.................not that I'm complaining!  :rolleyes:

It worked well and I did no further adjustment.

So, so far have not experimented in adjusting the Camera at all, and only carried out minimal adjustment to the Headset for its first daylight try out as above.

I think sharpness can possibly be improved a little with a lens tweak (which I have found quite usual!),  but the contrast and general quality of the image is quite impressive given the wide range of light level it works over.

Certainly not the "this is only good for very low light work" that the Owl (Mk1) got labelled with.

Incidentally, these comments are relevant to the IR Blocked NTSC Owl2 version I have. 

Next update I plan on that old high hours run quad is to update the cheap and now two year old EMax VTX. 

I'm leaving the std EMax motors, etc, as it's my "fast cruiser/mild aero" machine, no pretensions of "race" performance, but on cheap 2200mAh 3S it is managing 8 minutes plus with the screamer balance port alarm set to 3.6v per cell. After my other much more potent quads, its quite a nice feeling to have that length of flight time in pocket.  :smiley: