User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Have you missed your activation email?

MultiRotorUK ShoutBox

Refresh History
  • Cheredanine: GoPro lense is pretty unbeatable to be fair
    Today at 16:42:38
  • ched999uk: Back to multis - if anyone was thinking of ordering/ppre ordering RunCam Split they only have them with GoPro lenses at the moment!  ::)
    Today at 15:01:01
  • ched999uk: Ooh the good old days :smiley: Unfortunately way too much money involved these days.
    Today at 15:00:06
  • shawdreamer: back in the days of arton sennsa and nigel mansell a race was always closer, even though the cars back then wernt as limited and standardized across the teams as todays the drivers unique skills had a massive factor in how a race would pan out.... either way it was always a guaranteed sight to see..... same situ in footy, back in the days of vinny jones and the like, they took a nasty tackle and dislocated there knee, quick spit and wipe off and up they got to take the free kick, nowadays a fan calls them a poofters and they dive on the floor and throw a tantrum like a five yr old whos been told they cant have any sweeties.
    Today at 14:09:04
  • ched999uk: You are right about the entertainment factor. I think F1 is entertaining provided there are some closely matched competition or weather. I like teh fact that on some tracks a single slight error can cost the driver the race in F1. I used to love the, I think it was Rally Cross in the 80's. Saw some live with Metro XR4 at Brans, just amazing control. That was entertaining as rally+tarmac and cars racing each other side by side.
    Today at 11:50:05
  • Reman: I never really liked F1. It was too all or nothing for my liking. The driver had to get every racing line, breaking point and gear change right to have a chance at winning. In rallying, someone could barrel roll their car into a ravine, but if they could get back on the track and had a big enough lead they could still wind up finishing in a podium position. Now THAT'S  entertainment. :)
    Today at 10:04:18
  • Hozza: yeah all good thanks
    Today at 05:12:48
  • Gav: hi hoz ok thank you. u ok.
    June 27, 2017, 21:58:39
  • Hozza: Hey Gav hows it going?
    June 27, 2017, 21:39:18
  • Gav: Hello from Germany
    June 27, 2017, 21:20:31
  • Bad Raven: Wasn't a dog, cat in drag, 1 life gone, eight left....
    June 27, 2017, 12:59:16
  • shawdreamer: tell that to the dog :laugh:
    June 27, 2017, 12:37:54
  • JeremyE: The surface is constantly changing and you have way less time to react.
    June 27, 2017, 10:55:22
  • JeremyE: F1 requires way more skill!
    June 27, 2017, 10:54:31
  • ched999uk: Rally is great to watch and they display amazing control and skill. The problem for me is only seeing very limited clips of cars and it's a tie trial only. OK so the surface changes and they don't get to try the track before it matters. I like to see F1 drivers overtaking, OK so before anyone says what overtake in F1, it is getting better :)
    June 27, 2017, 10:35:24
  • shawdreamer: dont mean to take anything away from F1 drivers but when they race they rely on the road surface being dependably and consistently the same everytime..... a rally driver has to has to adjust his technique on every single turn and bend and take account that everytime another vehicle go's through that turn and bend ahead of his it changes the nature of the surface, F1 drivers are skilled, Rally drivers are skilled and brave..... and more than a little nuts
    June 27, 2017, 06:27:19
  • Hozza: BTCC is a good one to watch also, after all rubbing is racing
    June 26, 2017, 15:24:51
  • ched999uk: true
    June 26, 2017, 10:31:03
  • shawdreamer: "once ina while" is all very good with F1 but you watch a rally and everytime its a spectacle.
    June 26, 2017, 09:10:35
  • ched999uk: I assume you missed the F1 today. It was ore like rally cross!!!
    June 25, 2017, 23:45:50

MultiRotorUK Test

Who's Online

Theme Selection



Forum Default

Permanently

* Who's In The Chat Rooms

User in Chat:


Author Topic: Thinking about Taranis  (Read 521 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Thinking about Taranis
« on: February 17, 2017, 08:37:28 »
As title, I'm thinking of switching over from Spektrum to Taranis this year partly for the better choice, products and price. The choice of Rx's though is bewildering, not too bad for quads but I've a few nitro planes and looking at the range list of Rx's ( Xr, Sr, Xm, V8, D8, Long range ) leaves me confused. Do any of these supply basic telemetry for power flight packs 4 to 6volt without buying extra modules as I'm a great believer in keeping things as simple as possible.



Offline Cheredanine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 263
  • Posts: 3349
  • Liked: 642
  • Country: gb
  • Everything you have been told is a lie
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2017, 09:27:03 »
What sort of rc aircraft mate?
For racing quads go with xsr if you want telemetry and xm+ if you are not too fussed (although you can still get RSSI)

Offline Revs

  • aka Paul
  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 130
  • -Receive: 181
  • Posts: 3238
  • Liked: 1035
  • Country: gb
  • If it ain't broke... it will be soon!
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2017, 09:29:26 »
I finally got a Taranis a few weeks back, it's great. RX wise you wanna be look at the 'X' ones. So X4R/X8R if you need servo pins (planes), XSR for SBUS (quads) and XM/XM+ (SBUS) for micro quads. All have RSSI and all except the XM/XM+ have telemetry. Make sure you get RX's with the LBT firmware. Only D16 protocol will work so avoid the older D8 stuff.

Don't forget, you can bind mulitple RX's to one model on your TX. Just set the model number to '0' in the TX (you'll see once you have it and can start tinkering with it ;)). Great for quads.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2017, 09:50:42 »
I got, hanger 9 Piper cub saito 80, multiplex Funcub, Piper Pawnee, seagull 540 with a 150 laser, Astro Hog os 61fs, seagull Rv8 115 saito.
I have stopped buying ARTF planes now, fed up with with making them airworthy as they never have enough glue on them.
I have a few kits to start somtime. Mystic, sig 80" clipped wing cub. One of my favourites is a sig wonder with a enya 15 in it, goes like stink my heart jumps out of my chest at full chat. Only cost me a £10 at a boot sale.

Offline Cynabal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 20
  • -Receive: 4
  • Posts: 120
  • Liked: 28
  • Country: wales
  • ESC Destroyer
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2017, 09:57:47 »
I was looking at the taranis, but I held off, I dont know if its just me but isnt this style Tx a little long in the tooth? they havent changed form factor much since probably the late 70's it just looks old fashioned, Its big, bulky and heavy. I saw the Turnigy evolution and thought it looked on the right track to something more modern and  ergonomic, but its not quite right yet, I'll keep hold of my DX6i untill something like the Evolution comes out in frsky or atleast with a module slot.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2017, 10:13:11 »
I know what you mean about the size, but if you fly planes as well it's no different. I can see problems with the rotary switches in the future on the Horus and that cheaper taranis. At least the normal old fashioned type has just got push buttons. One thing I will say that's good with Spektrum is the rotary barrel menu switch "spot on"

Offline DarkButterfly

  • Wings in the sky
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 43
  • -Receive: 97
  • Posts: 1728
  • Liked: 1039
  • Country: gb
  • Got the Hexfactor
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2017, 10:53:32 »
One major problem I saw with the turnigy evolution is it has no trim switches.
Why use 4 motors when you can use 6?

Offline Cheredanine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 263
  • Posts: 3349
  • Liked: 642
  • Country: gb
  • Everything you have been told is a lie
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2017, 11:31:38 »
Turnigy evo is really designed for quad market
I would go taranis if you are flying planes unless you are desperate for a big tray format, in which case you are probably looking a Jeti and wandering how much you could get for the wife and kids

Offline Cynabal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 20
  • -Receive: 4
  • Posts: 120
  • Liked: 28
  • Country: wales
  • ESC Destroyer
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2017, 14:56:41 »
One major problem I saw with the turnigy evolution is it has no trim switches.

This is another reason i held off getting one, if the Evo was frsky and had trims i probably would have picked one up.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2017, 15:17:36 »
I finally got a Taranis a few weeks back, it's great. RX wise you wanna be look at the 'X' ones. So X4R/X8R if you need servo pins (planes), XSR for SBUS (quads) and XM/XM+ (SBUS) for micro quads. All have RSSI and all except the XM/XM+ have telemetry. Make sure you get RX's with the LBT firmware. Only D16 protocol will work so avoid the older D8 stuff.

Don't forget, you can bind mulitple RX's to one model on your TX. Just set the model number to '0' in the TX (you'll see once you have it and can start tinkering with it ;)). Great for quads.

I had a nice chat with t9 hobby, as well as Xr, Xm there is the Sr recivers as well. That's if you want gyros ! The lowest voltage they work on is 2.7v which is lower than my spektrum stuff. The servos would be the first to pack up. I did ask about getting a dsmx module so I wouldn't have to replace all the spektrum stuff at once but they reckoned I'd be asking for trouble.

Offline Cheredanine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 263
  • Posts: 3349
  • Liked: 642
  • Country: gb
  • Everything you have been told is a lie
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2017, 15:22:14 »
I know people who run the orange module in a taranis because their micro brushed quads come with built in speky and it is fine

I prefer frsky Rx in quads, smaller and lighter with diversity antenna, currently using xm+ in 5 inch quads

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2017, 15:24:32 »
I did notice those Xm+ Rx's all sold out.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2017, 15:38:31 »
What colour back lit screens have you got ? I see there is white to blue and white to red to choose from. Which ones best ?

Offline Cheredanine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 263
  • Posts: 3349
  • Liked: 642
  • Country: gb
  • Everything you have been told is a lie
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2017, 15:55:23 »
Xm+ are still in stock at Electricwingman although he has sold a lot today can't find anywhere else with them in stock in uk

The colour on the taranis is adjustable (or at least it is on the x9d

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2017, 16:16:26 »
Doing my research I've found that there is a white to amber red and a white to blue. Trust me to fancy the red and it looks like there is only the blue knocking about.

Offline Revs

  • aka Paul
  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 130
  • -Receive: 181
  • Posts: 3238
  • Liked: 1035
  • Country: gb
  • If it ain't broke... it will be soon!
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2017, 16:33:01 »
Yeah mine's blue. Though you can alter the colour between blue and white, also the usual brightness, contrast, etc.

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2017, 16:51:33 »
Xm+ are still in stock at Electricwingman although he has sold a lot today can't find anywhere else with them in stock in uk

The colour on the taranis is adjustable (or at least it is on the x9d

I had a look there but they don't have an alloy case with the tx, I'm trying to get it from the same place to keep postage costs down  ~~ Being born and dragged up in Yorkshire and living down south I have to keep up with the traditions of living tightly.  :laugh:

Offline Cheredanine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 263
  • Posts: 3349
  • Liked: 642
  • Country: gb
  • Everything you have been told is a lie
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2017, 17:21:20 »
Born and dragged up in Yorkshire myself, I sympathise, however I would still go for that xm+, just been through all uk suppliers I know and no one has. Delivery from china may not be quick so may be in for a short drought
« Last Edit: February 17, 2017, 20:50:32 by Cheredanine »

Offline trebor

  • Old boy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 543
  • Liked: 108
  • Country: england
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2017, 17:35:58 »
As I'm nearly finnished a 140 quad with spec/sat I will get one and practise setting up on a foam Funcub plane. It can take a bit of punishment and I'm not too worried about it. Then phase the other stuff out.

Offline DarkButterfly

  • Wings in the sky
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 43
  • -Receive: 97
  • Posts: 1728
  • Liked: 1039
  • Country: gb
  • Got the Hexfactor
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #19 on: February 17, 2017, 18:42:16 »
I bought 4 XM+ receivers from electricwingman, they arrived quite quickly too, all my aircraft are now on Frsky.

Probably my fault they're all sold out.
Why use 4 motors when you can use 6?

Offline bazzerh

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 21
  • -Receive: 109
  • Posts: 1358
  • Liked: 609
  • Country: gb
  • fpv miniquad addict
    • View Profile
Re: Thinking about Taranis
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2017, 08:35:40 »
with regards to your original question and nitro planes, I think the frsky stuff would be very suitable. I run D4R-II in a lot of planes and it is 2S lipo capable and has rx voltage telemetry as standard, no set up needed. D4R-II is 4 channels pwm so ideal for basic planes.
Round By Round Qualifying and Finals For All.

it just makes sense